(Environmental Accounting)Group Manufacturing Companies Located Overseas
Group Manufacturing Companies Located Overseas
Of the Yamaha Group's overseas manufacturing companies, two companies in Indonesia introduced environmental accounting in fiscal 2004. Three more introduced environmental accounting in fiscal 2006, bringing all manufacturing companies in Indonesia into the system.
- Target companie:
- PT. Yamaha Electronics Manufacturing Indonesia
PT. Yamaha Indonesia
PT. Yamaha Music Manufacturing Asia
PT. Yamaha Music Manufacturing Indonesia
and PT. Yamaha Musical Products Indonesia
Environmental Expenses
Environmental capital investment in fiscal 2011 was ¥23.4 million. Major investments included wastewater treatment facility,dust filters and acetone distillation systems. Environmental expenses amounted to ¥61.4 million.
| Environmental Expenses | (million yen) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Details | Investment*1 | Expenses*2 | ||
| Business area costs | Pollution prevention | Prevention of air, water and soil pollution, etc. | 14.4 | 20.2 |
| Energy conservation, etc. | Prevention of global warming, protection of the ozone layer, etc. | 2.1 | 0.4 | |
| Waste, etc. | Waste recycling, resource saving, conservation of water, etc. | 4.2 | 23.9 | |
| Upstream/downstream costs | Recycling of products, improvements in logistics, etc. | 2.6 | 1.5 | |
| Management costs | Environmental education, ISO 14001, greening of premises, etc. | 0.0 | 9.6 | |
| Research and development costs | Development of environmentally friendly products, prototypes, etc. | 0.0 | 1.3 | |
| Social activity costs | Social contributions, etc | 0.0 | 4.5 | |
| Environmental damage costs | Groundwater purification, SOx levies, etc. | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 23.4 (8.4) |
61.4 (7.9) |
||
| ( ) Indicates comparison with the previous year | ||||
- *1 Equipment investment refers to investment in factories and equipment made for environmental conservation objectives. The figure is calculated by multiplying the purchase price of individual pieces of equipment by a figure determined by the proportion of the environmental conservation purpose to the whole purpose of the purchase of such equipment (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1.0).
- *2 Expenses refer to personnel and other costs expended for environmental conservation activities. Personnel expenses are calculated by multiplying the time spent on environmental conservation activities determined by the manager of each department by a common unit cost of personnel expenses set in each company. Costs are determined by multiplying the amounts paid externally by a certain figure calculated using a proportional distribution method as in the case of investment amounts (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1.0). Depreciation costs are not included.
Environmental Investment
Environmental Expenses
Economic Effects
1. Environmental Conservation Effects
In fiscal 2011,CO2 emissions and water usage increased by 4,100 tons and 44,000m3 respectively, and amount of disposed waste decreased by 120 tons, compared with previous year.
| Environmental Conservation Effects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Details | Unit | FY2010 | FY2011 | Change |
| CO2 emissions | 10,000tons- CO2 | 3.93 | 4.34 | -0.41 |
| Water consumption | 10,000m3 | 30.2 | 34.6 | -4.4 |
| Waste treated or disposed of | 1,000tons | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.12 |
| Minus(-)indicates an increase | ||||
2. Economic Effects
In fiscal 2011, electricity and heating costs increased by ¥19.2 million, while water costs climbed by ¥0.4 million, sewerage costs grew by ¥0.1 million and waste disposal costs were ¥1.8 million higher than the previous fiscal year. Added income from the sale of valuable wastes amounted to ¥21.1 million resulting in a total negative economic effect figure of ¥0.5 million.
| Economic Effects | (million yen) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Details | FY2010 | FY2011 | Saving |
| Total savings | -21.5 | ||
| Electricity and heating costs | 375.6 | 394.9 | -19.2 |
| Water costs* | 25.9 | 26.4 | -0.4 |
| Sewerage costs* | 7.1 | 7.2 | -0.1 |
| Waste disposal costs* | 10.3 | 12.0 | -1.8 |
| Income from sales of valuable wastes | 9.8 | 21.1 | 21.1 |
| Economic effects | -0.5 | ||
| Minus(-)indicates an increase | |||
- * Data for fiscal 2010 has been recalculated. The table shows the revised values.
Third-Party Opinion
We obtained an opinion from a specialist to assist in improving the CSR Report.
Editorial Policy
Editorial policy for the CSR report.