Environmental Accounting

  Yamaha Corporation introduced environmental accounting in 1999 as a means of quantitatively evaluating the effectiveness of its environmental conservation activities. These environmental accounting practices were then implemented at Yamaha Group manufacturing companies and resort facilities in Japan, and since fiscal 2004 they have also been implemented at some overseas Group production sites. The Yamaha Group will continue to gradually expand these practices to other overseas Group companies.

Yamaha Group (Yamaha Corporation and Group Production Companies in Japan)

Environmental Expenses

  The Yamaha Group's environmental equipment investment in fiscal 2011 increased by ¥165 million compared to previous year, ¥85 million.

  Principal investments were for upgrade integrated effluent treatment equipment and also utility refinement.

Environmental Expenses(million yen)
Details

Investment*1

Expenses*2

Business area costs Pollution prevention Prevention of air, water and soil pollution, etc. 90.2 335.6
Energy conservation, etc. Prevention of global warming, protection of the ozone layer, etc. 53.2 61.0
Waste, etc. Waste recycling, resource saving, conservation of water, etc. 6.6 372.2
Upstream/downstream costs Recycling of products, improvements in logistics, etc. 0.4 70.3
Management costs Environmental education, ISO 14001, greening of premises, etc. 14.1 313.2
Research and development costs Development of environmentally friendly products, prototypes, etc. - 143.1
Social activity costs Social contributions, etc. 0.0 32.6
Environmental damage costs Groundwater purification, Sox levies, etc. 0.6 17.7
Total 165.0
(84.8)
1345.7
(-555.1)
(  ) Indicates comparison with the previous year
  • *1 Equipment investment refers to investment in factories and equipment made for environmental conservation objectives. The figure is calculated by multiplying the purchase price of individual pieces of equipment by a figure determined by the proportion of the environmental conservation purpose to the whole purpose of the purchase of such equipment (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1.0)
  • *2 Expenses refer to personnel and other costs expended for environmental conservation activities. Personnel expenses are calculated by multiplying the time spent on environmental conservation activities determined by the manager of each department by a common unit cost of personnel expenses set in each company. Costs are determined by multiplying the amounts paid externally by a certain figure calculated using a proportional distribution method as in the case of investment amounts (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1.0). Depreciation costs are not included.

Environmental Investment

Environmental Investment

Environmental Expenses

Environmental Expenses

(Data for previous years conducted a recount, we have posted the revised value.)

Economic Effects

1. Environmental Conservation Effects

  The Yamaha Group's CO2 emissions fell by 1,000 tons compared with the previous fiscal year to 62,700 tons due to the Kakegawa integration of piano production processes and the elimination and consolidation of businesses.

  Water consumption declined by 40,000 m3 year on year to 1,320,000 m3.

  As a result of the Yamaha Group's efforts to achieve the target of Zero Emissions through reuse of resources and other measures, final disposal at landfills was approximately 4.9 tons, down by 2.8 tons from the previous fiscal year. Emissions of chemical substances increased by 4 tons to 56 tons.

Environmental Conservation Effects
DetailsUnitFY2010FY2011Reduction amount
CO2 emissions 10,000tons-CO2 6.37 6.27 0.10
Greenhouse gas emissions 10,000tons-CO2 0.75 0.69 0.06
Water consumption 10,000m3 136 132 4
Waste treated or disposed of tons 7.7 4.9 2.8
Chemical substances released*3 tons 52 56 -4
CFC substitutes emissions tons 0.0 0.0 0.0
  • *3 “Chemical substances” refers to those substances subject to the PRTR Law that the Yamaha Group in Japan uses.

2. Economic Effects

  Electricity and heating costs increased by roughly ¥920 million to ¥2,211 million compared with the previous fiscal year. Water costs generally continued to be flat to ¥18 million, and sewerage costs increased by roughly ¥2 million to ¥32 million. Waste disposal costs came to ¥167 million, representing a savings of around ¥27 million.

  As a result of the conversion of waste to valuable materials, the Company gained ¥312 million in income from the sale of valuable materials, resulting in a total economic effect of ¥245 million.

  All figures presented are actual figures from the accounting register, and include no estimates.

Economic Effects(million yen)
DetailsFY2010FY2011Savings
Total savings -67
Electricity and heating costs 2,119 2,211 -92
Water costs 18 18 1
Sewerage costs 30 32 -2
Waste disposal costs 194 167 27
Income from sales of valuable wastes 250 312 312
Economic effects 245

Return to Top

Third-Party Opinion

We obtained an opinion from a specialist to assist in improving the CSR Report.

Editorial Policy

Editorial policy for the CSR report.